zoomarticle.com zoomarticle.com zoomarticle.com
   Main :> About Us :> Privacy of Info :> Terms of Use :> Add Url :> Add Article
Search:   
Free links exchange
 

People & Communities

Medicine & Treatment

Academics & Learning

Malls & Shopping

Software & Networking

Art & Creative

Eating & Drinking

Children

Business & Commerce

Tour & Travel

Events & News

Investment & Finance

Lifestyle & Fashion

Science & Research

Music & Entertainment

Policies & Law

Automobile & Automotive

Self Enhancement

Home & Garden

Online & Board Games

Sports & Adventure

Property & Agents

Jobs & Employment

Health & Hygiene

 

Main –› Software & Networking –› SEO Solutions
 

Improve Google Page Rank

 

Is Page Rank Calculation still following the BackRub Algorithm? An examination of the PR algorithm, with examples from real world sites. Many a time and oft, we hear the speculation that the Page Rank Calculation has changed. Disappointingly, it is voiced by people who should know better. Perhaps the green monster of jealousy at seeing a spammy (competitor) site or a google bomb taking a site to PR-7 gets the better of their judgement. We will proceed to shatter a few urban legends.

1. Home page is necessarily a higher PR than the rest of the site.
2. Older pages get highest PR.
3. Google considers on page factors or contents to judge PR.
4. Pages with most external link backs get the highest PR.

To justify our assertions more rigorously, lets first quickly introduce the Page Rank Calculation.

Page rank measures the importance of a page using the Google page rank formula: PR(A) = (1-d) + d (PR(T1)/C(T1) + ... + PR(Tn)/C(Tn))

The page rank shown on a tool bar is actually a scaled number between 0-10. The scaling is logarithmic to accommodate the widely different number of IBLs, where a linear scale would not convey the information appropriately. While we are not privy to the log factor lf that Google uses for its Page Rank tool bar normalization, we take a stab at the number by making a few assumptions. We assume that Google is the highest ranking PR10 page. We use the number of links incoming to Google reported by Google itself. On March 29, 2006 it shows it to be 3,750,000 links. We further assume that the average Page rank of the links pointing to the Google home page is PR 1.

Therefore, to obtain the upper bound of the log factor(lf), we just take the appropriate root. (e.g. ((Incoming Links to Google)^(1/(Google PR-Average_Incoming_PR)) ) ).

This boils down to (3.75*10^6)^(1/(9)) or lf=5.38. Naturally, as the size of the web increases, or the number of back links that Google exports to outside world increases, lf is likely to increase. Our tool allows you to set a different lf.

We use the following formula to scale numbers to the RPR(real non normalized PR) and obtain the lower and upper bounds.

((lf)^(n)) =< RPRn < ((lf)^(n+1))

As an example when n=5, 4507 < PR-5 < 24,248

Naturally, some pages are a very strong PR-5(i.e. almost a PR-6), or a very weak PR-6. Therefore, we allow a user to set the strength of the page. The default is 0.5(i.e. its the equivalent of a PR5.5 page).Now, if the above holds, then 1, 2 or 3 are irrelevant. Our contention is that Google has not changed the Page Rank calculation in any significant way, aside from tweaking the constants.The proof is obviously in the pudding. Lets take three sample sites and see how the update of April 6, 2006 has affected them.

We turn to our Event Tickets Website and examine two pages on the site:
1. Tickets Website's Home Page , PR-4
2. New Tickets Events Page , PR-6

The comparison is indeed telling. A page that was added a few weeks ago attained the highest PR in the site. While the home page with most of the back links stayed at 4. The reason is quite obvious if you examine the actual pages. The home page is donating its PR to a lot of pages, while the new events page has only 3 outgoing links(in addition to the common links). This behavior is predictable, if we apply the backrub algorithm. Happenstance, you say? Lets look at another site, with less contents and a different offer/e-commerce pricing model. The common feature is that the navigation structure is exactly the same.

1. Tickets Website's Home page , PR 3
2. New Tickets Event Page , PR-5
Coincidence, you say? Lets look at a third site
1. Click Fraud Website's Home Page PR-4
2. Click Fraud Website's Internal Page internal pages like click fraud with no link to Zaralyzer but lots of links from external sites, PR-5 In conclusion, even the most trivial changes in site navigation structure can cause major changes in how the search engine view your pages. For a free Google Page Rank Improvement Consultation on how you can improve your site structure.

For More Information visit http://www.sofizar.net/improve-google-pagerank.php

Author: Ron Arthur
 
Author Bio:
Ron Arthur is a reputed author. Ron likes to write articles about this subject.
This article can be searched using: search engine optimization services, search engine optimization firm
 
 
 

Related Articles

 
Stuck on Keywords
 
Three Things That Matter In Internet Marketing
 
The Past, Present, and Future of Affiliate Marketing
 
Use the Power of your Voice to Attract More Clients
 
Is Submitting to Yahoo's Directory Worth the Price?
 
SEO Made Easy!
 
Why Long Web Pages are Better than Short Ones
 
Skyrocket Your Internet Marketing Sales With This Simple Offer
 
Internet Marketing Is No Big Secret
 
Web 2.0: For the User, By the User
 
 
 
Main :> Privacy of Info :> Terms of Use
Copyright © 2008 www.zoomarticle.com All Rights Reserved.